Language & Ecology Online Journal (2004) available from http:// www.ecoling.net/journal.html

 

 

Editorial: The Controlled Environment

 

It is appropriate that this, the first special edition of Language & Ecology Online Journal, begins on a pig farm. After all, the modern ‘high intensity confinement’ farm exemplifies the ultimate extreme of a ‘controlled environment’. Down on the high intensity farm, pigs have the convenience of not having to move from their cages at any time. Their food is brought to them, their wastes fall through a slatted floor into a pit below. A solid bar separating mothers from babies spares mothers from the stress of tending their babies directly, and many pigs do not have to interact at all with others since they enjoy individual accommodation. The air temperature is always controlled, never too hot, never to cold, and at all times ammonia and other noxious gasses are kept at sub-lethal levels.

A pigs' paradise perhaps? It is difficult to canvass the opinions of the pigs, but based on our own experience it is not hard to imagine that they would prefer to breath fresh air, root around a bit for food, gather some bedding when it gets cold, have a mud-bath when it gets hot, interact with fellow pigs, and nurse their own piglets. In other words, live according to their nature, even if it is a little inconvenient at times. And it is no surprise that pigs living naturally play an integral part in sustaining ecosystems, whereas high-intensity confinement farms cause massive environmental damage.

Parallels between the experience of pigs and people are not hard to find. In crowded cities, with cars, fast food, air-conditioned skyscrapers and work practices tying people to desks, we are rapidly creating a controlled environment for ourselves. A convenient, sub-lethal environment which can be sustained for the time being, but at great cost to the natural ecosystems in which we evolved and generally, given the chance, prefer to root around in, even if it is a little inconvenient at times.

The discipline of deep ecology questions the social, cultural and political values which lie at the root of ecological devastation, and explores ways that humans can find contentment by living closer to their nature, and in doing so contribute to ecological harmony. Since language is central to social and cultural construction, and constitutes much of the political sphere, linguistics has an important role to play in deep ecology.

The tools of critical discourse analysis can be used to reveal underlying political and economic ideologies which are implicated in ecological destruction. Within the discourses of the car industry, fast food industry, finance industry and theoretical economics, such ideology is not hard to find. But there are other cases, in which environmentally harmful ideologies may be hidden in discourses where they are least expected, for example within those of environmentalism, animal welfare, psychotherapy, ecology or ecolinguistics itself.

Language & Ecology Online Journal aims to raise awareness of the ecological impacts of discursive constructions, and encourage the exploration of discourses which can play a role in restoring ecological harmony.

The first article in this edition presents a critical analysis of the discourse of the pork industry, showing how pigs are constructed in ways which lead to ecological destruction. The second article begins the process of considering alternatives to ecologically destructive discourses, but cautions against environmental ‘political correctness’. A more promising way of stimulating discursive change, poetic activism, is considered in the third article. Finally, the fourth article applies poetic activism to the case of pigs.

 

Arran Stibbe, February 2002 

 

<close window to return>